Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
101. CSM results - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: When I say polls i am thinking of polls like the ones done for RL elections. You don't seat and wait people to come and answer, you get their data, split them in demographic groups, and engage them actively by phone, ...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.14 15:36:00
|
102. CSM results - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Unpaid consultants? To consult what? Guess! Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: So they are happy with it? Take their word for it. http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/csm8-elections-close-tomorrow-hear-fr...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.12 11:01:00
|
103. ISBoxer and other Multi Boxing Software - Should it be banned? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kharamete wrote: Mate, CCP would make billions more than they do now if they made pvp in High Sec consensual and introduced raids and arenas and a theme park. It would attract a lot more players than the current vision. . Ask Star Wars: Gala...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.12 08:11:00
|
104. CSM results - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Please tell, what is the business case for the CSM? Enlighten me with a non-incorrect and non-childish assumption. Unpaid consultants with a minor PR poost for the CSM existing. The former is the most important of ...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.11 14:55:00
|
105. CSM results - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ali Aras wrote: Interestingly, you likely would have had a lot better luck this year with your candidates. Assuming of course they could even find a candidate in this year's group. Pickings were pretty slim if you weren't in a null bloc.
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.11 07:40:00
|
106. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DarthNefarius wrote: CCP striped the names off too guarrenty anomnimity so I doubt those stats are easily available also in the endorsement prcess it was possible to giv multiple endorsements after your endorsee announced they had made it you c...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.11 02:18:00
|
107. CSM results - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: The CSM is a business resource intended to keep the customers happy. If it fails to represent the customers, it fails to keep them happy and so fails to fulfill its intended role. Is this copied and pasted from a F...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.10 20:24:00
|
108. Lets face it: NOT VOTING IN CSM8 IS A VOTE FOR NULL SEC BLOCKS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DarthNefarius wrote: Compulsory sufferage is one system although you'll get a few peeps that get around that like they do in Australia You can unsub from Australian elections? Neat! How'd they work that?
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.09 19:26:00
|
109. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DarthNefarius wrote: Well you can always take out the second part of your sentence & force them to vote thru compulsory sufferage. It wouldn't in any way guarenty representation but it could give CCP a better idea of player preferences afte...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.08 21:46:00
|
110. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Green Gambit wrote: [Well I actually answered that question before I posed the line you quoted. Please at least read before trying to troll. I read it. It didn't answer why the CSM somehow became even more balanced despite this obvious dan...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.08 09:39:00
|
111. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Green Gambit wrote: The big danger with FPTP was that more null-sec alliances started copying the Goons and the council become almost completely null-sec dominated. And how does this explain CSM 7? CSM 6 was null dominated as it was the firs...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.08 09:02:00
|
112. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Green Gambit wrote: Oops! He advocated against it during CSM 6, which had just been by-and-large swept by nullsec with just FPTP. With those circumstances it probably would have been worst-case scenario.
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.08 08:49:00
|
113. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: If you look at the numbers, I really didn't get a lot of support from the HBC. Sort R.U.N.N.O.F.T. with ~75% of their "voting power". I got maybe a couple of hundred effective votes from them - less than I got from the "Ripard S...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.08 08:33:00
|
114. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: I am finding it funny that I keep being the dark horse who proves things didn't work as planned in the election because you cannot figure out who the hell voted for me. I lack a bloc yet I got enough to get elected. Once ...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.08 08:19:00
|
115. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM8 Election Statistics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: yeah the big story of this election was how staggeringly bad the HBC is at this voting thing Correction: "Was" :v
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.07 22:25:00
|
116. CCP Please - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Ok so the CSM is a PR stunt, these forums are crap, people are insane and the CSM should only be for Null. Not really sure why your still posting, you have shown that your reasons for not wanting this change is entirely self...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.06 22:47:00
|
117. CCP Please - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Does that mean you have to take someone's trolling seriously if they did in fact vote?
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.06 21:22:00
|
118. CCP Please - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: I'd like to know so that if, for instance, people are complaining about the CSM being "unrepresentative", I can advise them that not voting has the expected result of not being represented. Conversely if the complainer has voted...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.06 20:36:00
|
119. CCP Please - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: If it's so super important to you that people should be able to hide the fact that they voted, then the flag could be optional. How about you explain why it's important that a CSM member knows if a player has voted or not i...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.06 20:16:00
|
120. CCP Please - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
What always strikes me about these "let's give people _______ if they vote!" arguments is how you're on one hand admitting that the CSM itself just isn't going to ever be interesting enough on its own to get a significantly larger amount of people...
- by Snow Axe - at 2013.05.06 18:35:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |